The seminar will run sporadically during Fall 2023. Talks will continue to be updated in this site.
We will live stream the local logic seminar with the following login information:
Zoom link to local UW logic seminar
Meeting ID: 986 3594 0882
Passcode: 003073
Abstract: The concept of Scott sentence complexity was introduced by Alvir, Greenberg, Harrison-Trainor and Turetsky and gives a way of assigning countable structures to elements of the Borel hierarchy. By calculating the Scott sentence complexities occurring in a class of structures we obtain a detailed picture of the descriptive complexity of its isomorphism relation. We study possible Scott sentence complexities of linear orderings using two approaches. First, we investigate the effect of the Friedman-Stanley embedding on Scott sentence complexity and show that it only preserves complexities. We then take a more direct approach and exhibit linear orderings of all Scott sentence complexities except and for a limit ordinal. We show that the former can not be the Scott sentence complexity of a linear ordering. In the process we develop new techniques which appear to be helpful to calculate the Scott sentence complexities of structures in general.
This talk is based on joint work with Dino Rossegger.
Abstract: Since Dehn proposed the word problem in 1912, it has been an important topic of study in both group theory and computability theory. Most naturally occurring groups are recursively enumerable (r.e.). Their word problem can be defined to be the r.e. set of words equal to the identity of the group, which is analyzed using Turing reductions. By the Higman embedding theorem, any r.e. degree is realized as a word problem of an r.e. group.
In this talk, we consider the word problem of a group as a computably enumerable equivalence relation (ceer), namely, two words are equivalent if and only if they are equal in the group. We compare ceers using the notion of computable reductions. We see that, while the Higman embedding theorem preserves Turing degrees, it does not preserve ceer degrees in general. Contrasting the classical context, we show that not every ceer degree is realized as the word problem of some group. This shows that the landscape of word problems as ceers is very different from the classical theory.
This is a joint work with Uri Andrews and Luca San Mauro.