Logic and the Art of Speaking


"Argument":
Bob:        The death penalty is immoral.
Susan:      No, it isn't.
Bob:        Yes, it is! Judges who gve the death penalty should be impeached.
Susan:     You don't even know how the death penalty is decided.
Bob:        I know a lot more than you do.
Susan:     I can't talk to you; you are a idiot.

Definition:
Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.
Premises are assumptions.
An argument uses premises to support a conclusion.
A fallacy is a deceptive argument, i.e. an argument where the conclusion is not supported by the premises.

Examples:

"Ford makes the best automobile in America. After all, more people drive Fords than any other American car."

Premise:         More people drive Fords than any other American car.
Conclusion:    Ford makes the best automobile in America.
Appeal to Popularity.

"I placed a quartz crystal on my forehead, and in five minutes my headache was gone. The crystal made my headache go away."

Premise: 1.    I placed a quartz crystal on my forehead.
              2.    In five minutes my headache was gone.
Conclusion:   The crystal made my headache go away.
False Cause

"Scientists have not found any concrete evidence od aliens visiting Earth.Therefore, anyone who claims to have seen a UFO must be hallucinating."

Premise:       There is no proof that aliens visited the Earth.
Conclusion:   Aliens have not visited Earth.
Appeal to Ignorance

"On my travel in Scotland I saw black sheep out of the train window. All sheep in Scotland are black"

Premise:        On my travel in Scotland I saw black sheep out of the train window.
Conclusion:   All sheep in Scotland are black.
Hasty Generalization


"You don't support the President, so you are not a patriotic American."
Premise:         You don't support the President.
Conclusion:    You are not a patriotic American.
Limited Choice (or False Dilemma)


In a commercial for Michelin tires, a picture of a baby is shown with the words "because so much is riding on your tires".
Premise:        You love your baby.
Conclusion:   You should buy Michelin tires.
Appeal to Emotion


Gwen:        You should stop drinking, because it's hurting your grades, endangering people when you drink and drive, and destroying your relationship with your family.
Merle:        I've seen you drink a few too much on occasion myself!
Premise:         Gwen occasionally drinks too much.
Conclusion:    Whatever Gwen says about drinking is false.
Personal Attack


"Society has an obligation to shelter the homeless because the needy have a right to the resources of the community."
Premise:          The needy have a right to the resources of the community.
Conclusion:     Society has an obligation to shelter the homeless.
Circular Reasoning


"We should not continue to fund genetic research because there are so many ethical issues involved. Ethics is at the heart of our society, and we cannot afford to have too may ethical loose ends."
Premise:         Genetics funding is related to ethics. And here is an argument relating to ethics: "Ethics is at the heart of our society, and we cannot afford to have too may ethical loose ends."
Conclusion:    We should not continue to fund genetic research.
Diversion (Red Herring)


Columnist William F. Buckley has written many articles arguing in favor of legalizing drugs. A speaker who opposes legalization begins by stating,"Mr. Buckley doesn't think there's anything wrong with drug use, but I do."
Analysis: Mr Buckley does not advocate drug use. His argument may be based on reasons like the crime rate, the cost of policing and the consistency of  and respect for the law.
The speaker misrepresents Mr Buckley and then proceeds to knock down the distorted argument.
Straw Man


and then there are variations:
  1. appeal to authority:   A is an authority on the subject and A says p is true, therefore p is true.
  2. appeal to belief, tradition, common practice,
  3. appeal to force (consequences): do it or else (there might be disagreeable consequences).
  4. division: if p is true for combined entity A, it must be true for all its component pieces.(this is a generalization of hasty generalization)
  5. slippery slope: Event X has occurred (or will or might occur),  therefore event Y will inevitably happen. (this is a generalization of false cause)
  6. special pleading:  Person A accepts standard(s) S and applies them to others in circumtance(s) C, Person A is in circumstance(s) C, therefore A is exempt from S.
  7. two wrongs make a right: It is claimed that person B would do X to person A, thus it is acceptable for person A to do X to person B (when A's doing X to B is not necessary to prevent B from doing X to A).
  8. prejudicial language: loaded or emotive terms are used to attach value or moral goodness to believing the proposition or suspicion or dislike to the opposing position.
  9. weak analogy: Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren't really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.
  10. equivocation: is a sliding between two or more different meanings of a single word or phrase that is important to the argument
  11. complex question: Two otherwise unrelated points are treated as a single proposition. The reader is expected to accept or reject both together, when in reality one may be acceptable while the other is not. A complex question is an illegitimate use of the "and" operator.
Examples:
Common Fallacy Types - Overview
appeal to popularity diversion slippery slope
false cause  straw man special pleading
appeal to ignorance appeal to authority two wrongs make a right
hasty generalization appeal to belief prejudicial language
limited choice appeal to tradition weak analogy
appeal to emotion appeal to common practice equivocation
circular reasoning appeal to force complex question
personal attack division