\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb}

\def\aa{{\mathcal A}}
\def\al{\alpha}
\def\be{\beta}
\def\ff{{\mathcal F}}
\def\forces{{\;\Vdash\;}}
\def\ga{\gamma}
\def\goth{\mathfrak}
\def\om{\omega}
\def\poset{{\mathbb P}}
\def\prodaa{\prod_{n<\om}\aa_n}
\def\proof{\par\noindent proof:\par} 
\def\qed{\nopagebreak\par\noindent\nopagebreak$\Box$\par}
\def\reals{{\mathbb R}}
\def\res{\mathord{\upharpoonright}}
\def\rmand{\mbox{ and }}
\def\rmor{\mbox{ or }}
\def\si{\sigma}
\def\sm{\setminus}
\def\su{\subseteq}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} % [section]
\newtheorem{prop}[theorem]{Proposition}

\begin{document}

\begin{center}
The onto mapping property of Sierpinski
\end{center}

\begin{flushright}
A. Miller \\
July 2014\\
revised May 2016
\end{flushright}


\bigskip

\noindent Define

(*) There exists $(\phi_n:\om_1\to \om_1:n<\om)$ such that
for every $I\in [\om_1]^{\om_1}$ there exists $n$ such
that $\phi_n(I)=\om_1$.

\bigskip

This is roughly what Sierpinski \cite{sier} refers to as $P_3$ but I think
he brings $\reals$ into it.  I don't know French so I cannot say for sure
what he says but I think he proves that (*) follows from
the continuum hypothesis.  
Here we show that the existence of a Luzin set implies (*) and 
(*) implies that there exists a nonmeager set of reals of size $\om_1$.
We also show that it is relatively consistent that (*) holds
but there is no Luzin set.  All the other properties in this paper,
(**), (S*), (S**), (B*) are shown to be equivalent to (*).

\bigskip

\begin{prop}(Sierpinski \cite{sier})
CH implies (*).
\end{prop}

\proof

Let $\om_1^\om=\bigcup_{\al<\om_1}\ff_\al$ 
where the $\ff_\al$ are countable and increasing.
For each $\al$ construct $(\phi_n(\al):n<\om)$ so that for
every $g\in \ff_\al$ there is a some $n$ such that $\phi_n(\al)=g(n)$.

Now suppose $I\su\om_1$.  If no $\phi_n$ maps $I$ onto $\om_1$, 
then there
exists $g\in\om_1^\om$ such that $g(n)\notin\phi_n(I)$ for every $n$.
If $g\in \ff_{\al_0}$, then $\al\notin I$ for every $\al\geq\al_0$.
This is because $g\in \ff_\al$ and so for some $n$ $g(n)=\phi_n(\al)$
and since $g(n)\notin \phi_n(I)$ we have $\al\notin I$.
\qed

\bigskip \noindent Define

(**) There exists $(g_\al:\om\to\om_1:\al<\om_1)$ such that for every
$g:\om\to\om_1$ for all but countably many $\al$ there are infinitely
many $n$ with $g(n)=g_\al(n)$.

\begin{prop}
(**) iff (*).
\end{prop}

\proof

To see (**) implies (*) let $\phi_n(\al)=g_\al(n)$. Then the proof
of the first proposition goes thru. 

On the other hand suppose
$(\phi_n:\om_1\to \om_1:n<\om)$ witnesses (*).  First note
that for any 
$I\in [\om_1]^{\om_1}$ there are infinitely many $n$ such
that $\phi_n(I)=\om_1$.  This is because if there are only
finitely many $n$ we could cut down $I$ in finitely many steps
so that there were no
$n$ with $\phi_n(I)=\om_1$.

Now define $g_\al\in\om_1^\om$ by 
$g_\al(n)=\phi_n(\al)$.  These witness (**).
Given any $g:\om\to\om_1$ if there is
an uncountable $I\su\om_1$ and $N<\om$ such that for every $\al\in I$
we have $g(n)\neq g_\al(n)$ for all $n>N$ then this means
that $g(n)\notin \phi_n(I)$ and for all $n>N$ and so (*) fails.

\qed

Obviously (**) is false if ${\goth b}>\om_1$
so (*) is not provable just from ZFC.

\begin{prop}
It is relatively consistent with any cardinal arithmetic that 
(*) is true and ${\goth b}={\goth d}=\om_1$.
\end{prop}

\proof

Start with any $M$ a countable transitive model of ZFC.
Our final model is $M[g_\al,f_\al:\al<\om_1]$
where each $g_\al:\om\to\al$ is generic with respect to the poset of
finite partial functions from $\om$ to $\al$ and $f_\be\in\om^\om$ is
Hechler real over $M[g_\al,f_\al:\al<\be]$.  The $\om_1$-sequence
is obtained by finite support ccc forcing.
By ccc for any $g\in \om_1^\om\cap M[g_\al,f_\al:\al<\om_1]$
there will be $\al_0<\om_1$ such 
that $\al_0$ bounds the range of $g$ and
$g\in M[g_\al,f_\al:\al<\al_0]$.  It follows by product genericity that
for every $\al\geq\al_0$ there are infinitely many $n$ such that
$g(n)=g_\al(n)$.  The Hechler sequence $f_\al$ for $\al<\om_1$ shows
that ${\goth d}=\om_1$.

\qed

With a little more work we will prove that (*) follows
from the existence of a Luzin set (Prop \ref{luzin}).
We will also show that (*) implies there is a nonmeager set
of reals of size $\om_1$ (Prop \ref{nonmeag}) and so in the
random real model (*) fails and ${\goth b}={\goth d}=\om_1$.

\bigskip

\bigskip

\bigskip\noindent
Actually I think Sierpinski 
considers what appears to be a stronger version:

\bigskip\noindent Define

(S*)  There exists $(\phi_n:\om_1\to \om_1:n<\om)$ such that
for every $I\in [\om_1]^{\om_1}$ for all but finitely many $n$
$\;\;\;\phi_n(I)=\om_1$.

\bigskip
Surprisingly (S*) is equivalent to (*).

\begin{prop}\label{sstar}
(S*) iff (*).
\end{prop}

\proof

We show (**) implies (S*).

Let $a_0=1$ and $a_{n+1}=1+\sum_{i\leq n} a_i$.
Let $$\aa_n=\{u \;\;|\;\; \exists D\in [\om_1]^{a_n}\;\; u:D\to\om_1\}
\rmand \prodaa=\{g  \;\;|\;\;  \forall n \; g(n)\in \aa_n\}$$
Since each $\aa_n$ has cardinality $\om_1$ from (**) we
get $(g_\al\in \prodaa:\al<\om_1)$ such that for every 
$g\in\prodaa$ for all but countably many $\al$ there are
infinitely many $n$ such that $g(n)=g_\al(n)$.  For each 
$\al<\om_1$ define $h_\al:\om\to\om_1$ so that if $g_\al(n)=u_n:A_n\to\om_1$
for every $n$ then 
$$h_\al\res (A_n\sm \cup_{i<n}A_i) = u_n\res (A_n\sm \cup_{i<n}A_i)$$
Since $|A_k|=a_k$ the sets $A_n\sm \cup_{i<n}A_i$ are nonempty.
We claim that
the $h_\al$ have the following property:

\bigskip\noindent Define \par
(S**) For any $X\in [\om]^\om$ and $h:X\to\om_1$ for all but countably many
$\al$ there are infinitely many $n\in X$ with $h(n)=h_\al(n)$.

\bigskip
It is enough to see there is at least one $n\in X$ with $h(n)=h_\al(n)$.
Otherwise if there were only finitely many $n$ for uncountably many $\al$
we could throw out from $X$ a fixed finite set for uncountably many $\al$ and
get a contradiction.

Let $X=\{x_n: n<\om\}$ listing $X$ in increasing order.
Define $g\in\prodaa$ by $g(n)= h\res\{x_i:i<a_n\}$.  Now suppose
$g_\al(n)=g(n)$.  This means that if $g_\al(n)=u_n:A_n\to\om_1$, then
$A_n=\{x_i:i<a_n\}$ and $u_n = h\res A_n$.  But since
$A_n\sm \cup_{i<n}A_i$ is nonempty we get that $h_\al(x)=h(x)$ for
some $x\in X$.

Now define $\phi_n(\al)=h_\al(n)$.  This has the required property (S*).
Given $I$ uncountable let $X$ be the $n\in \om$ with $\phi_n(I)\neq \om_1$.
If $X$ is infinite we would get $h:X\to\om_1$ such that
$h(n)\notin \phi_n(I)$ for all $n\in X$. 
But this means that for all $\al\in I$
and $n\in X$ that $h(n)\neq h_\al(n)$ which contradicts (S**).

\qed

This is related to results in Bartoszynski \cite{barto}.

\bigskip
Bagemihl-Sprinkle \cite{bag} say that Sierpinski states CH implies (S*) but
only proves (*).  They give a proof from CH of a
seemingly stronger version:

\bigskip\noindent Define \par
(B*)  There exists $(\phi_n:\om_1\to \om_1:n<\om)$ such that
for every $I\in [\om_1]^{\om_1}$ for all but finitely many $n$
for all $\be<\om_1$ there are uncountably many
$\al\in I$ with $\phi_n(\al)=\be$, i.e., not only is
$\phi_n(I)=\om_1$ but it is uncountable-to-one.

\begin{prop}
(S*) iff (B*)
\end{prop}

\proof
Let $\pi:\om_1\to\om_1$ be uncountable to one, i.e.,
for all $\be<\om_1$ there are uncountably many
$\al<\om_1$ with $\pi(\al)=\be$.  If $(\phi_n:\om_1\to \om_1:n<\om)$ witness
(S*) then $(\pi\circ\phi_n:\om_1\to \om_1:n<\om)$ satisfies (B*).
\qed

\begin{prop}\label{luzin}
If there is a Luzin set, then (*) is true.
\end{prop}
\proof

We prove (**).
Suppose $\{g_\al:\om\to\om\;:\;\al<\om_1\}$ is a Luzin set,
then it satisfies that
for every $k:\om\to\om$ for all but countably many $\al<\om_1$
there are infinitely many $n$ such that $k(n)=g_\al(n)$.


There is a sequence
$(f_\al:\al\to\om:\om\leq \al<\om_1)$ of one-to-one
functions which is coherent: for $\al<\be\;\; f_\be\res\al=^* f_\al$,
i.e., $f_\be(\ga)=f_\al(\ga)$ 
for all but finitely many $\ga<\al$.  This is the
construction of an Aronszajn tree which appears in
the first edition of Kunen's set theory book \cite{kunen}.

Let $\hat{g}_\al:\om\to\al$ be any map which extends $f_\al^{-1}\circ g_\al$.
We claim that for any $k:\om\to\om_1$ which is one-to-one that
for all but countably many $\al$ there are infinitely many $n$ with
$\hat{g}_\al(n)=k(n)$.   To see this suppose $k:\om\to\be$ is one-to-one
and let $\hat{k}=f_\be\circ k$ which maps $\om$ to $\om$. Then for
some $\al_0>\be$ for all $\al\ge\al_0$
there will be infinitely
many $n$ with $g_\al(n)=\hat{k}(n)$.  This means
that $g_\al(n)=f_\be(k(n))$.  Since $k$ is one-to-one, there
will be infinitely many such $n$ where $f_\be(k(n))=f_\al(k(n))$.
But $g_\al(n)=f_\al(k(n))$ implies $\hat{g}_\al(n)=k(n)$.

To get rid of the requirement that $k$ be one-to-one,
let $j:\om_1\times\om \to \om_1$ be a bijection and
$\pi:\om_1\to \om_1$ be projection onto first coordinate, i.e.,
$\pi(j(\al,n))=\al$.   Define $h_\al(n)=\pi(\hat{g}_\al(n))$. 
Given any $k:\om\to\om_1$ define $\hat{k}(n)=j(k(n),n)$.
Then since $\hat{k}$ is one-to-one for all but countably
many $\al$ there will be infinitely many $n$ with
$\hat{g}_\al(n)=\hat{k}(n)$.  But this implies 
$$h_\al(n)=\pi(\hat{g}_\al(n))=\pi(\hat{k}(n))=k(n)$$
Hence $(h_\al:\al<\om_1)$ satisfies (**).

\qed

\begin{prop}\label{nonmeag}
Suppose (*), then there exists $(x_{\al,\be}\in 2^\om:\al,\be<\om_1)$
such that for every dense open $D\su 2^\om$  there exists
$\al_0<\om_1$ such that for every $\al\geq\al_0$ there is
a $\be_\al<\om_1$ such that $x_{\al,\be}\in D$ for every $\be\geq\be_\al$.
\end{prop}
\proof
We use that there are
$\{h_\al:\om\to\om\;:\;\al<\om_1\}$ with the property that
for every $X\in[\om]^\om$ and $h:\om\to\om$ for all but countably
many $\al$ there are infinitely many $n\in X$ with $h(n)=h_\al(n)$
(see (S**) in the proof of Prop \ref{sstar}).
This implies that there exists 
$(X_\al\in [\om]^\om:\al<\om_1)$ such that for every $Y\in [\om]^\om$
for all but countably many $\al$ there are infinitely many
$x\in X_\al$ such that $|Y\cap [x,x^+)|\geq 2$ where $x^+$ is
the least element of $X_\al$ greater than $x$.  Fix $\al$ and
enumerate $X_\al=\{k_n:n<\om\}$ in strict increasing order.
Define
$$P_\al=\{g:\om\to FIN(\om,2)\;:\;\forall n\;\; g(n)\in 2^{[k_n,k_{n+1})}\}$$
By (S**) there exists $g_{\al,\be}\in P_\al$ for $\be<\om_1$ with the
property that for any $h$ in $P_\al$ and infinite $Y\su\om$ for
all but countably many $\be$ there are infinitely many $n\in Y$ with
$h(n)=g_{\al,\be}(n)$.   Define $x_{\al,\be}\in 2^\om$ by
$x_{\al,\be}(m)=g_{\al,\be}(n)(m)$ where $n$ is the unique integer
with $k_n\leq m<k_{n+1}$.  Equivalently $x_{\al,\be}=\bigcup_ng_{\al,\be}(n)$.
(Without loss we may assume $k_0=0\in X_\al$.)

Given $D\su 2^\om$ dense open let $\hat{D}\su 2^{<\om}$ be the
set of all $s$ with $[s]\su D$.  Construct an infinite $Z\su\om$ so
that for every $z\in Z$ there exists $t\in 2^{<\om}$ with
$|t|\leq z^+-z$ such that for every $s\in 2^{<\om}$ with
$|s|\leq z$ we have $s\, t\in \hat{D}$ where $s\,t$ is
the concatenation of $s$ with $t$.  By construction
there exists $\al_0$ so that for every $\al\geq\al_0$ the
there are infinitely many $x\in X_\al$ with $|[x,x^+)\cap Z|\geq 2$.

Fix $\al\geq \al_0$ and as above $X_\al=\{k_n:n<\om\}$.  Let
 $$Y=\{n\;:\; |[k_n,k_{n+1})\cap Z|\geq 2.$$
Note that by the definition
of $Y$ there is a $h\in P_\al$ with the property that for
every $n\in Y$ for every $s\in 2^{k_n}$ we have $s\cup h(n)\in \hat{D}$.
For some $\be_\al$ for every $\be\geq\be_\al$ there are infinitely
many $n\in Y$ with $h(n)=g_{\al,\be}(n)$ and so $x_{\al,\be}\in D$.
\qed

This is similar to the argument of Miller \cite{char}.
Obviously the set of $x_{\al,\be}$ in Prop \ref{nonmeag} is nonmeager.
Although it seems a little bit like a Luzin set, it isn't.
In the first version of this paper I asked:

\bigskip  Does the existence of a nonmeager set of reals of size
$\om_1$ imply (*)?

\bigskip
To my surprise   O. G. Gonz\'alez \cite{gonz} proved that in fact, the existence
of a nonmeager set of reals of size $\om_1$, i.e., non(meager)=$\om_1$ implies
(*), so they are equivalent.   It also follows from his result that the Luzin like
set of Proposition \ref{nonmeag} is equivalent to (*).
 Judah and Shelah \cite{judah} have shown that it is consistent that
 non(meager)=$\om_1$ and there are no Luzin sets.   This holds 
in the model obtained by countable support iteration of length $\om_2$ of 
superperfect tree forcing\footnote{ So called Miller forcing. I also called it
rational perfect set forcing. } over a ground model of CH.    Gonz\'alez \cite{gonz}
also gives a model in which (*) holds and there are no Luzin sets,  in fact, in his
model it is true that for any nonmeager subset $X\su\om^\om$ there is an $f\in\om^\om$ such that
for uncountably many $g\in X$ $\;\;\forall n \; f(n)\neq g(n)$. 

\bigskip

This paper was motivated by a result in an earlier
version of A.Medini \cite{med} which
showed that (*) implies that there is an uncountable $X\su 2^\om$ with 
the Grinzing property: for every uncountable
$Y\su X$ there is an uncountable family of uncountable
subsets of $Y$ with pairwise disjoint closures in $2^\om$.
To do this Medini used a result from Miller \cite{onto}.
This has been superceded by a proof in ZFC of an uncountable $X\su 2^\om$
with the Grinzing property.

\bigskip\hrule\par\bigskip

\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{bag} Bagemihl, F.; Sprinkle, H. D.; On a proposition of Sierpinski's
which is equivalent to the continuum hypothesis. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5,
(1954). 726-728.

\bibitem{barto} Bartoszynski, Tomek; Combinatorial aspects of measure and
 category. Fund. Math. 127 (1987), no. 3, 225-239.

\bibitem{gold} Goldstern, M.; Judah, H.; Iteration of Souslin forcing,
projective measurability and the Borel conjecture. Israel J.
Math. 78 (1992), no. 2-3, 335-362. 

\bibitem{gonz}  Gonz\'alez, Osvaldo Guzm\'an; The onto mapping of Sierpinski and
non-meager sets, eprint Jan 2016.

\bibitem{judah} Judah, H.; Shelah, S.;
Killing Luzin and Sierpinski sets.
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1994), no. 3, 917-920.

\bibitem{kunen} Kunen, Kenneth; {\bf Set theory. An introduction
to independence proofs}. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics,
102. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York, 1980. xvi+313 pp. ISBN:
0-444-85401-0 

\bibitem{med} Medini, Andrea; Distinguishing perfect set properties
in separable metrizable spaces, eprint May 2014.

\bibitem{onto} Miller, Arnold W.;
Mapping a Set of Reals Onto the Reals,
Journal of Symbolic Logic, 48(1983), 575-584.

\bibitem{char} Miller, Arnold W.; A Characterization of the Least Cardinal for
which the Baire Category Theorem Fails. Proceedings of the American Mathematical
Society, 86(1982), 498-502.

\bibitem{sier} Sierpinski, Waclaw; {\bf Hypothese du continu}.
New York, Chelsea Pub. Co., 1956.

\end{thebibliography}

\bigskip

\begin{flushleft}
 Arnold W. Miller \\
 miller@math.wisc.edu \\
 http://www.math.wisc.edu/$\sim$miller\\
 University of Wisconsin-Madison \\
 Department of Mathematics, Van Vleck Hall \\
 480 Lincoln Drive \\
 Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1388 \\
\end{flushleft}

\end{document}
